The Boston Acoustics Microsystem CD is a very nice small music system. In its day it was known as the Bose Wave Killer. The equivalent Bose system (roughly same price, age, size & specs) would probably be the AWR3CP CD Radio. I have used both systems, and I have to say I much prefer the sound quality of the Boston Acoustics system.
The Bose system has a full sound and via its 'wave technology' ducted speaker design produces way more bass than it should. The main problem with the Bose system, is that there are no tone controls at all, the designers have set the sound quality and you will have it the way they choose. In the evening or at nighttime, the Bose system produces too much bass, you really want to turn it down, but can't. Then you find out that the Bose system isn't even stereo, its a mono system in which Bose has used tricks to create a kind of phantom stereo effect.
The Boston Acoustics system is truly stereo and manages to produce a very nice sound without any tricks or 'waveguides'. After listening to the Boston system for only a few songs I could fully understand how it earned its title of 'Bose Wave Killer'. The sound quality of the Boston unit is much more 'free' and less constrained, and the bass tones are much more natural. Going back and listening to the Bose system again, the bass sounds almost 'forced', it sounds ok even quite nice with certain types of music, but for voices such as chat shows and phone-ins and other music, the bass is just too much.
Thankfully, The Boston engineers have thought about this and given us a 'bass cut' control on the back, so we may turn the bass down if we wish. Not as good as a full tone control, but a very nice feature. Why Bose decided not to give us any control over the bass is a question only their engineers can answer. I've heard that some people think they said "we are the experts, we know how it should sound and that's how it will be", which is ok in a lab with optimum listening conditions, but in each persons home it will sound different and everyone's hearing is different, so it seems conceited for them not to give us any control over the tone.
Moving on to build quality, again the Boston system wins out. It has become evident over the years that the parts and components used in the Bose system are cheap crap. The CD decks in the Bose units are cheap Sanyo units, of which similar units cost £9.99, but the actual ones used in Bose systems are price hiked to around £50. I had expected the amplifier chip in the Bose to be some fancy pants audio chip, but was shocked to find the exact same audio chip used in cheap car radios.
To be fair to Bose, I haven't investigated the audio chip used in the Boston system yet, but other components seem to be good quality. The CD deck in the Boston unit is a front loader, it seems to be a very complicated unit, but appears to be well built and sturdy.
I guess it seems like I am down on the Bose unit in this review, and I suppose I am, but its based on real life using and repairing several of the Bose units, and now using and repairing a couple of the Boston units. In my findings, the Boston unit wins out on every front.
Both the Bose and Boston units in this review are from around 2005, I cannot comment on older or more modern systems from either manufacturer, since I have not owned or worked on them.